Mon premier blog

Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth Larry Laudan
Publisher: University of California Press

I think there have been some successes, but a lot of Science is a combination of gathering facts and making theories; neither can progress on its own. I do think Laudan at least makes a good case that the rationality of scientists accepting a theory can be understood in terms of how effective the theory is at solving the problems the scientists are concerned with. Simultaneous timing of multiple intervals: Implications for the scalar property. Now it is the turn of climate The problem with climate science, however, is that its vision of the problem has gradually become more and more dramatic. The bombardment of light, with its colors and contrasts, helps guide proper eye growth. Progress and its problems: Toward a theory of scientific growth. Studies of resource depletion, such as "The Limits to Growth" of 1972 were attacked and demonized in the 1980s, and then consigned to the dustbin of "wrong" scientific ideas. Progress and Its Problems: Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth. It's true there's been a lot of work on trying to apply statistical models to various linguistic problems. Larry Laudan's 'Progress and its problems: Towards a theory of scientific growth' explains this beautifully. Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. But growth of the eye also depends heavily on external cues — what scientists call visual feedback. Most importantly, Laudan implicitly assumes that we can't specify a standard for measuring scientific progress (say, truth) if we have no epistemic access to evidence that would allow evaluation of how far science has progressed towards that standard. Like moving taxes on work towards taxes on raw materials and fossile fuels in particular. What a theory is supposed to do etc etc. Berkeley: University of California Press. Although coarse-grain system dynamics models were used in the past to predict the growth and development of scientific research, among the limitations of their use include (1) lack of heterogeneity in terms of individuals' decisions, actions, career choices, as well as learning and . I think Chomsky is wrong to push the needle so far towards theory over facts; in the history of science, the laborious accumulation of facts is the dominant mode, not a novelty. An explicit model of knowledge production that converts human, financial, and knowledge capital into resources (e.g., open problems, skills), which are then transformed into solutions and products.